Texas Monthly wrote late last month about parents demanding accountability from Camp Mystic and the other camps in the Hill Country, flooded out last summer with massive loss of life — much of that preventable if many camps hadn't built new cabins in floodplains, had better emergency systems, and were in counties with better emergency systems.
Here's the nutgraf, about one-third in.
[E] ven as they reached out to one another, parents of the girls who died at Camp Mystic say they were cut off from its owners, the Eastlands. Their questions went unanswered. As they learned more about the timeline and events of that night, comparing accounts and reviewing the camp’s safety protocols, they concluded that members of the multigenerational Eastland family had acted irresponsibly. On November 10, the Hollises and the families of seventeen other Mystic campers and two counselors filed the first round of negligence and wrongful death lawsuits, claiming that the camp ignored flood warnings and failed to enact adequate safety measures. Attorney Mikal Watts, who is representing the Eastlands, reiterated to me what he has said in multiple media interviews: The camp’s shelter-in-place orders were based on what was learned in past floods and were in line with FEMA and other government agencies’ flood protocols.
I've written about the Eastlands before, along with some of the other sites — including getting the Obama-era FEMA to pencil-whip floodplain maps. So, Tweety Eastland and descendants posturing as "we were hurt too" can go fuck themselves.
And, that's where the story takes off. Yes, Dick Eastland died trying to save a camp kid. Yes, Tweety has been to at least one camper funeral. But, the families above note? Trying to get information, you know, like about possibly building in a floodplain, just hasn't been happening.
On the legal controls side, the Trib then reports on the new camp regulation statutes the Department of State Health Services has just proposed. The biggie is a massive increase in camp licensing and relicensing fees. It's "progressive" based on camp size, so it won't drive smaller camps out of business. That hasn't stopped smaller camps from bitching, cuz Tex-ass, cheapness and capitalism.
Here's the Trib's pull-outs:
Last month, the Department of State Health Services teased the dramatic change during a meeting to discuss the rollout of a pair of camp safety bills that the Legislature passed in response to the July 4 Hill Country floods that killed at least 137 people, including 27 campers and counselors at Camp Mystic.
At that meeting and in a survey the state conducted in the fall, several camp operators said such licensing fees and other new requirements could put many in the industry out of business because most camps are small nonprofits.
“This causes an undue burden for smaller or more remote camps,” according to a survey response from Livingston-based Boxwoods camp obtained by The Texas Tribune. “All the costs that are a result of this legislation should not be passed on to camps.”
Also proposed Tuesday is an overhaul of the little-known Youth Camp Advisory Committee, which meets semiannually to request rule changes to the state health agency and to lawmakers when they are in session. The Texas Tribune found that the makeup of this committee for many years has been mostly camp leadership and that while members can’t make rules, they can influence how much rules impact the industry. Camp Mystic’s Britt Eastland is a current member.
The proposed change to the nine-person advisory committee would reduce the number of camp operators on the board from seven to four, and would replace them with specialized positions, such as one for a parent who has attended camp in the past two years. It also requires a person specialized in camp activities, and someone who is a child abuse expert, a pediatric psychologist or a psychiatrist to be on the committee.
Actually, yes, the cost of legislation SHOULD be pushed to you; that's the whole point of regulation like this. And, if you're running your camp on such small margins this really would fiscally injure you, you probably should shut down anyway.
There's this on the floodplain:
Other proposed changes include prohibiting a youth camp from placing a cabin within a Federal Emergency Management Agency-identified 100-year floodplain unless it’s located on a still body of water, such as a lake or pond, or is not connected to a watercourse, such as a river or stream, and the resulting water is dammed. Even if the cabin falls into these exceptions, it must be 1,000 feet away from a floodway, and the youth camp operator must install and maintain emergency ladders capable of providing access to the cabin’s roof.
Not onerous.
And, this, more so, on the emergency communications:
A youth camp operator will also be required to provide and maintain broadband internet services using end-to-end fiber-optic facilities and a secondary broadband internet connection.
Multiple camp operators said in the state survey they were concerned about the broadband requirements because of how geographically remote they are.
“We contacted AT&T (our local internet provider) to receive an estimate for fiber optic installation and were quoted the exorbitant cost of $1.7 million. This is cost-prohibitive and virtually impossible for us to access,” according to a response from Huntsville-based Forest Glen Camps.
Since there is until Dec. 19 for input, if there's some way that one can reasonably be modified, I'm OK. If this were adult-only camps, I'd be OK with eliminating it, even.
As for Kerr County's refusal of state emergency update money in the past? The Trib and Pro Publica report they were far from alone, and that some legiscritters acknowledge the bill was flawed, both on relative high local match share requirements and other stringencies.